A digital archive showcasing the extensive collection of jewellery and adornment images shared on the former Ethnic Jewels Ning site over the years. These images have significantly enriched discussions on cultural adornment and its global dispersion.
You need to be a member of Adorned Histories to add comments!
Request your copy of our newsletter.
If you would like to receive our newsletter
Comments
Wow, Peter, this is an exceptionally superb piece. you are right, the Niello work IS outstanding.
When I was in Armenia I was often told that this piece or that came from Van, but unfortunately I naver came across something quite as masterful. Congratulations, Betty.
PS: One of the extensions hanging from the belt seems to be a sheet for a knife, but what is the other? Other than this martial addition, the belt looks very feminine to me...
Dear Betty; Many thanks for your message. I agree with you, the belt does look feminine. Yes, one of the extensions is for the knife, which is displayed next to it. It could be that the hook was used to hang a pouch, etc.. Probably one of the EJ members knows more about it. With kind regards. Peter
Dear Peter,
While surfing the internet, I came across a book (on Amazon) that struck me:
“Armenian Master Silversmiths” (2005) by Osep Tokat. It is in English & Armenian.
I presume you already know it (and maybe have it). If not: it seems interesting enough to me.
Kind regards. JM.
The exhaustive list of states that ruled over Van and its surroundings, for those among us with more than average interest in history:
11th century BC: a capital (named Toushpa) of the Urartu kingdom.
7th century BC: proto-Armenian (who called themselves ‘Haik’ and their land ‘Hayastan’).
ca. 610 BC: Medes, and later Persians (a satrap ruling the province).
ca. 331 BC: Alexander the Great.
ca. 305 BC: part of the Seleucid Kingdom, but its satrap is +/- independent.
ca. 100 BC: Armenian (founded by Tigranes the Great).
Until 4th century: periodically under Roman and Persian (at first Parthian, then Sasanid) suzerainty.
ca. 635: under Arabic raids and control.
early 8th century: Armenian (Bagratid dynasty of Vaspurakan).
ca. 772: Armenian (Ardzrouni dynasty of Vaspurakan).
1021: given to Byzantium, in exchange for territories around Sivas.
1068: Great Seljuks.
ca. 1075: Marwanids (Arab or Kurdish dynasty; capital: Diyarbakır).
14th century: Karakoyunlu (Turcoman) with short Timurid intermezzo (1402-1408)
1468: Akkoyunlu (Turcoman)
1503: Persian (Safavid dynasty)
1514: the Safavid lost control, after the Ottoman victory in the Battle of Çaldıran.
1548: fully Ottoman (and a governor is appointed)
1915-1918: Russian.
1918-today: Turkish again (Ottoman until 1922; then Turkish Republic).
As to the population and its culture, prior to WW1, one can say that the city’s inhabitants were predominantly Armenian. In spring 1915, the Armenians of Van rebelled against the Ottoman government (which had started the Armenian deportations and genocide); the Ottoman army besieged the city, that was relieved by a Russian offensive coming from the Caucasus. In early 1918, when the Ottoman retook the city, the Armenians of Van (wisely) accompanied the retreating Russian army. The new town (4 km away from the old, destroyed city) is now populated by Turks and Kurds.
Van was famous for its silver works. Before 1918 the vast majority of Van’s silversmiths were Armenians (there were reportedly more than 100 Armenian gold- and silversmiths in the city). It is, therefore, rational to label as ‘probably from an Armenian workshop’ all silver work from Van, that can be dated ‘before 1918’.
I think I must have missed this belt earlier, Peter. It's a masterpiece. @Jean Marie, thanks very much for all the information about the long and complicated history of the area of Van .... like other places in the Middle East it's so difficult to untangle. But that's what makes it so fascinating.
Such splendid workmanship. This niello reminds me of the Russian style with the floral motifs.
Dear All; Many thanks for all your comments. This is definitely an extraordinary belt and I am very happy having it in my collection. I did not see much similar pieces of this belt. With kind regards. Peter